This paper compares area scaling capabilities of many kinds of SRAM margin-assist solutions for VTvariability issues, which are based on various efforts by not only the cell topology changes from 6T to 8T and 10T but also incorporation of multiple voltage supply for cell terminal biasing and timing sequence controls of read and write. The various SRAM solutions are analyzed in light of an impact on the required area overhead for each design solution given by ever-increasing VTrandom variation (¿VT)> resulting in a slowdown in the SRAM scaling pace. In order to predict the area scaling trends among various SRAM solutions, two different ¿VT-increasing scenarios of being pessimistic and optimistic are assumed, where o-vt becomes > 130 mV and suppressed toVTcan be suppressed toVTbecomes > 85 and 75 mV, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H. Yamauchi (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: