Key result
STEMI patients with standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) had a significantly lower 30-day all-cause mortality compared to SMuRF-less patients (5.1% vs 8.7%, HR 0.82).
Why the study?
SMuRF-less STEMI patients have been shown to have worse outcomes, but limited research exists in China, leaving their clinical characteristics and prognosis unclear.
Does the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF-less status) increase mortality in STEMI patients compared to those with traditional risk factors?
Cohort (n=379,811)
Yes
Does the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF-less status) increase mortality in STEMI patients compared to those with traditional risk factors?
Hazard Ratio: 0.82 (95% CI 0.8–0.84)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.1% vs 8.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
STEMI patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF-less) experience higher 30-day mortality and lower rates of guideline-directed medical therapy compared to those with traditional risk factors.
SMuRF-less STEMI patients may face higher short-term mortality; leaves open whether this reflects biology, care gaps, or confounding in observational data.
Aims In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) are strongly associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, clinical studies have shown that SMuRF-less patients have worse clinical outcomes. Limited research exists in China, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of SMuRF-less patients remain unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of SMuRF-less patients in China. Methods We retrospectively analysed adult patients with STEMI using data from the China Chest Pain Center database. We examined the impact of SMuRF-less on short-term (0 to 30 days) and long-term (31 to 365 days) mortality. Cox-proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis for short-term and long-term mortality. Results Of the 379,811 patients, 87,830 (23.1%) were SMuRF-less. Patients in the SMuRF-less group were older (65 years vs. 63 years), a higher proportion of female (29.4% vs. 23.3%) and less like to receiving reperfusion therapy (81.1% vs. 85.6%). On short-term SMuRFs patients had significantly lower all-cause mortality (5.1% vs 8.7%, hazard ratios (HR) 0.82 [95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.80–0.84], P < 0.001). However, on long-term there was no significant difference in mortality between the groups (3.4% vs 3.8%, HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05; P = 0.841). Conclusions SMuRF-less patients exhibited higher mortality, particularly within the first 30 days after STEMI onset, with a more pronounced effect observed in male patients. Treatment disparities and delayed care were key contributors to this difference. Graphical abstract Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between STEMI patients with SMuRF-less and SMuRFs. SMuRF-less was defined as having no traditional risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, or smoking history), while SMuRFs had ≥1 risk factor. Among STEMI patients, SMuRF-less patients, who accounted for 23% of the cohort, had a higher proportion of females, longer delays to first medical contact (FMC), lower rates of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and reperfusion, and higher short-term mortality compared to SMuRFs (77%). Kaplan-Meier analysis shows lower 30-day mortality in SMuRF-less patients (HR:0.82, 95% CI: 0.80–0.84, P < 0.001), with no significant difference in long-term mortality (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96–1.05, P = 0.841). Abbreviations: STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; SMuRFs, standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors; FMC, first medical contact; GDMT, guideline-directed medical therapy; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=379,811). Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) vs. SMuRF-less (absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors) was evaluated on Short-term (0 to 30 days) all-cause mortality (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.84, p=<0.001). STEMI patients with standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) had a significantly lower 30-day all-cause mortality compared to SMuRF-less patients (5.1% vs 8.7%, HR 0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: