Proposes guidelines for establishing an internal peer review program in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to improve physician performance and quality of care.
Cath labs should adopt SCAI peer review guidelines to improve performance; extends standardization of quality metrics in interventional cardiology.
The Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions has proposed guidelines for establishing an internal peer review program in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first step is to establish a committee and a data base. This data base should include quality indicators that reflect: physician qualifications, outcomes of procedures, and processes of care. The outcomes must be risk-adjusted to account for the variable severity of illness. Data should be collected by catheterization laboratory personnel and entered into a laboratory-specific computerized data base. These data must be analyzed and organized into profiles that reflect the quality of care. Based on this information, the Committee would institute the following interventions to improve physician performance: education, clinical practice standardization, feedback and benchmarking, professional interaction, incentives, decision-support systems, and administrative interventions. The legal aspects of peer review are reviewed briefly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heupler et al. (1997) conducted a review in Cardiac catheterization. Internal peer review program was evaluated. The Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions proposed guidelines for establishing an internal peer review program in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to improve physician performance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: