Why the study?
Is there differential platelet activation between unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes?
Cohort
Is there differential platelet activation between unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes?
This study aims to determine if platelet activation, measured by mean platelet component, differs between unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction.
Quantitative platelet activation differences in ACS remain unreported; leaves open whether activation differs between UA and AMI.
ecent observational studies in acute coronary syndromes have shown that factors influencing the degree of platelet activation also influence the mode of presentation. Prior aspirin treatment and smoking-with directionally opposite effects on platelet function-were found to be independently associated with unstable angina and myocardial infarction, respectively. 1 However, the few studies involving direct measurement of activation parameters in acute coronary syndromes have not provided a consensus regarding this. 2 3 To clarify whether there is differential activation in unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction we have prospectively assessed platelet activation in a cohort of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes by using a light scattering technology to determine mean platelet component, a marker of platelet degranulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon Kennon (2003) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndromes. Unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction was evaluated on Platelet activation (mean platelet component).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: