The diffusivity of 3He atoms in perfect crystals of tungsten has been studied employing the atom-probe field-ion microscope (FIM) technique. Tungsten FIM specimens were implanted in situ with 300-eV 3He+ ions, to a fluence of 3×1015 ions cm−2, at specimen temperatures which ranged from 60 to 110 K. The 3He+ ion beam was analyzed magnetically and the ion source was connected to the atom probe through a differentially pumped aperture. At an implantation energy of 300 eV no radiation damage was produced by the implanted 3He atoms. Thus, the state of a tungsten specimen after an implantation consisted of 3He atoms with an initial depth distribution that was determined solely by the range profile of the low-energy ions. Isothermal annealing experiments between 90 and 110 K were employed to study the kinetics of recovery of the implanted 3He atoms; at 60 K the 3He atoms are immobile. This data, in combination with a suitable diffusion model, was used to determine—for the first time—the diffusivity [D3He(T)] and the enthalpy change of migration of 3He atoms (Δhm3He ) in tungsten. The quantity D3He (T) is given by the Arrhenius expression: D3He(T)=(5.4±10.63.8) ×10−3 exp(−0.28 eV/kT)cm2 s−1. The value of Δhm3He is approximately the same as for Δhm4He (0.24–0.32 eV). D3He (T) is compared with the diffusivity values of 1H and self-interstitial atoms in tungsten—the self-interstitial atoms are considerably more mobile than 3He or 4He atoms at the same temperature, as are the 1H atoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amano et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: