Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The crystal structures of bis(2,2':6',2"-terpyridine)ruthenium(II) perchlorate hydrate, bis(2,2':6',2"- terpyridine)osmium(II) perchlorate hemihydrate and bis((1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)(pyridin-2-yl)- amine)iron(II) tetrafluoroborate dihydrate are described. In the terpyridine complexes the ruthenium-nitrogen distances and the corresponding osmium-nitrogen distances are not significantly different. In both complexes the ligand geometry and the metal ion environment show the distortions usual for bis(terpyridine) systems. Distortions are less marked in the bis((1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)(pyridin-2-yl)amine)iron(II) cation in which each tridentate unit forms one five-membered and one six-membered chelate ring. [Ru(trpy)2] [ClO4]2.(H2O)1.1: tetragonal, space group I 41/ a , a , b 12·527(2), c 40·202(11) Å, Z 8. [Os(trpy)2] [ClO4]2.(H2O)0·5: monoclinic, space group P 21/ n , a 8·842(3), b 8·861(1), c 39·22(2) Å, ß93·89(2)°, Z 4. [Fe(phpyam)2] [BF4]2.(H2O)2: triclinic, space group P -1, a 12·43(1), b 12·45(1), c 13·35(1) Å, a 62·70(10), ß 78·55(8), ? 72·46(9)°, Z 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: