Conservative Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Key result
Conservative management strategies for acute coronary syndrome yield early catheterization rates of 10% to 57%, whereas aggressive strategies typically use early catheterization in over 90% of patients.
Why the study?
Does a conservative management approach compared to an aggressive approach improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Population
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
Comparison
Conservative management approach vs Aggressive management approach
Design
Review
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
The text reviews the rationale and differences between conservative and aggressive management strategies for acute coronary syndrome.
Structured PICO
Does a conservative management approach compared to an aggressive approach improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
P
Population
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
I
Intervention
Conservative management approach (serial clinical evaluations and noninvasive stress tests to identify high-risk patients for catheterization)
C
Comparator
Aggressive management approach (early diagnostic cardiac catheterization in >90% of patients)
The text reviews the rationale and differences between conservative and aggressive management strategies for acute coronary syndrome.
Cite This Study
Mark et al. (2002) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Conservative management vs. Aggressive management was evaluated. Conservative management strategies for acute coronary syndrome yield early catheterization rates of 10% to 57%, whereas aggressive strategies typically use early catheterization in over 90% of patients.