Mineralogical analysis reveals that goethite and ferrihydrite drive copper retention in weathered saprolite, suggesting weak acid leaching optimizes metal extraction.
The Carajás Mineral Province hosts one of the world’s most extensive sulfide-bearing copper belts. These deposits are typically covered by thick regolith, including gossans, laterites, colluviums, and soil, which can be used as important exploration indicators. In some cases, these covers can be mined alongside the parent hypogene ore. Therefore, accurate identification of copper-bearing minerals is essential for selecting the most appropriate metallurgical techniques. This study investigated the saprolite horizon overlying the Alvo 118 deposit, where the parent rocks are chloritites hosting copper-bearing hypogene sulfides, partially altered to an immature gossan. Saprolite formation was primarily controlled by the weathering of chlorite, mostly converted into kaolinite, with smectite and vermiculite serving as intermediates, forming a typical lower saprolite association. During weathering, iron released from chlorite and indirectly by vermiculite and smectite contributed to the formation of ferrihydrite, goethite, and hematite. Magnetite octahedrons, relics of the hypogene ore, pseudomorphic phases, are embedded in the clay mineral matrix. While FTIR analysis of kaolinite showed no evidence of copper retention, Mössbauer spectroscopy enabled the quantification of iron-bearing minerals, revealing a strong correlation between CuO contents and goethite and ferrihydrite. These results suggest that goethite and ferrihydrite may be the main copper carriers in the deposit, consistent with findings from similar deposits. Weak acid leaching is proposed as the most effective technique for copper extraction from this mineralization type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: