Poly( N -isopropylacrylamide-co- N, N ′-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate sulfate) [P(NIPAM-co-DMAEMASA)] was prepared from N -isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) and N, N -dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate sulfate (DMAEMASA) monomers, and its properties were compared with those of poly( N -isopropylacrylamide-co- N, N ′-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) [P(NIPAM-co-DMAEMA)]. The copolymers were characterized by swelling measurements in distilled water (10−40 °C) and buffer solutions ( I = 0.1 M, pH = 2.2−10.0), FTIR, DSC, and SEM methods. The ESV’s of the NIPAM-DMAEMASA copolymers in distilled water were 5 times higher than those of P(NIPAM-co-DMAEMA); they decreased with an increase in comonomer (DMAEMASA/DMAEMA) content for both copolymers. While NIPAM-DMAEMASA copolymers did not display any phase transition with temperature, the LCST of the NIPAM-DMAEMA copolymer was determined as 20 °C. Both copolymers displayed a phase transition at pH = 5.0, but the pH of the phase transition for NIPAM-DMAEMA gels shifted to 7.0 with increased DMAEMA content. Glass transition temperatures of NIPAM copolymers did not change with the type and content of comonomer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gürdağ et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: