Key result
A deep learning prognosis model trained on manual stretching data predicted recovery outcomes in robotic-assisted stretching training with 91.84% accuracy.
Why the study?
Because neurorehabilitation mechanisms are incompletely understood, stroke recovery prognosis is difficult, and few models exist to predict outcomes across multiple treatments.
Can a deep learning prognosis model trained on one rehabilitation treatment accurately predict recovery outcomes for a different treatment in stroke survivors?
Observational (n=15)
Can a deep learning prognosis model trained on one rehabilitation treatment accurately predict recovery outcomes for a different treatment in stroke survivors?
A deep learning model can accurately predict stroke recovery outcomes across different rehabilitation modalities using clinical, biomechanical, and EEG biomarkers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transferable DL models predicted stroke recovery across rehab trainings with >87% accuracy in 15 patients; leaves open clinical utility pending larger prospective validation.
Since the underlying mechanisms of neurorehabilitation are not fully understood, the prognosis of stroke recovery faces significant difficulties. Recovery outcomes can vary when undergoing different treatments; however, few models have been developed to predict patient outcomes toward multiple treatments. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of predicting a treatment's outcome using a deep learning prognosis model developed for another treatment. A total of 15 stroke survivors were recruited in this study, and their clinical and physiological data were measured before and after the treatment (clinical measurement, biomechanical measurement, and electroencephalography (EEG) measurement). Multiple biomarkers and clinical scale scores of patients who had completed manual stretching rehabilitation training were analyzed. Data were used to train deep learning prognosis models, yielding an 87.50% prognosis accuracy. Pre-trained prognosis models were then applied to patients who completed robotic-assisted stretching training, yielding a prognosis accuracy of 91.84%. Interpretation of the deep learning models revealed several key factors influencing patients' recoveries, including the plantar-flexor active range of movement (r = 0.930, P = 0.02), dorsiflexor strength (r = 0.932, P = 0.002), plantar-flexor strength (r = 0.930, P = 0.002), EEG power spectrum density and EEG functional connectivities in the occipital, central parietal, and parietal areas. Our results suggest (i) that deep learning can be a promising method for accurate prediction of the recovery potential of stroke patients in clinical scenarios and (ii) that it can be successfully applied to different rehabilitation trainings with explainable factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Stroke (n=15). Deep learning prognosis model vs. Manual stretching rehabilitation training (training set) was evaluated on Prognosis accuracy. A deep learning prognosis model trained on manual stretching data predicted recovery outcomes in robotic-assisted stretching training with 91.84% accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: