Key result
A Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device was found to have perforated the uterus and penetrated the appendix in a 24-year-old woman, requiring removal via laparotomy.
Case Report (n=1)
Copper-containing IUDs can cause uterine perforation and subsequently penetrate neighboring viscera such as the appendix, requiring surgical removal.
Raises awareness for visceral penetration in IUD perforations; leaves open incidence and management questions.
This case is presented of a 24-year old woman who came to an antenatal booking clinic following a 17-week period of amenorrhea and 10 months after her last pregnancy. A Copper 7 IUD had been inserted 8 weeks after the birth of her last child. Follow up visits after IUD insertion had shown no problems but an unplanned pregnancy followed and there was no evidence of an IUD within the uterus. When the infant was born no IUD was found although the uterine cavity was not explored. At laparoscopy the IUD was found to be embedded in omentum and apparently lying adjacent to the appendix but at laparotomy was seen to have penetrated the appendix wall. The appendix, IUD, and adherent omentum were removed and no site of uterine perforation was identified. Reported incidence of uterine perforation with IUDs varies from 1/350 to 1/2500 insertions. Copper containing devices are more often embedded in omentum than plastic devices and thus require laparotomy for removal. Intraperitoneal IUDs do not necessarily produce symptoms but may intrude on neighboring viscera such as the bladder or intestinal tract. Copper containing IUDs are known to cause irritation and although translocation may have occured at the time of insertion, appendiceal penetration was almost certainly a later event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McWhinney et al. (1983) conducted a case report in Uterine perforation and appendiceal penetration by IUD (n=1). Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device was evaluated on Uterine perforation and appendiceal penetration. A Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device was found to have perforated the uterus and penetrated the appendix in a 24-year-old woman, requiring removal via laparotomy.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: