Key result
Thromboprophylaxis in neurocritical care remains underutilized despite its known benefits, highlighting a gap between knowledge and clinical practice.
There is a significant gap between knowledge and practice regarding thromboprophylaxis for DVT prevention in neurocritical care patients.
Persistent gap in neurocritical DVT thromboprophylaxis should not yet alter practice; leaves open implementation trials to close it.
INTRODUCTION Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in critically ill neurological patients and can lead to thromboembolic episodes, which can in turn lead to morbidity and can even be fatal. Although there is paucity of data on the actual incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as a cause of death in Indian patients, recent evidence suggests that DVT occurs as frequently among Asians as it does among Caucasians.[ 1 ] More importantly, it is a preventable complication, and hence there is a need for greater awareness of thromboprophylaxis among treating neurophysicians and neurosurgeons. There is also a great need for neurosurgeons to understand the role of anticoagulants when the benefits outweigh the risk. Despite our better understanding and the growing body of evidence regarding the beneficial role of thromboprophylaxis among medical and neurological Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, there is a general gap between knowledge and actual practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smita Sharma (2016) conducted a review in Deep vein thrombosis in neurocritical care. Thromboprophylaxis was evaluated. Thromboprophylaxis in neurocritical care remains underutilized despite its known benefits, highlighting a gap between knowledge and clinical practice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: