Key result
Using structured methods to improve care is the hallmark of quality improvement for emergency laparotomy patients, but attention must also be paid to the context in which these methods are used.
Why the study?
Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery face higher mortality than elective cases, alongside widespread variations in standards of care between hospitals that correlate with differences in mortality.
Structured quality improvement methods for emergency laparotomy care require attention to the context in which they are implemented.
Variations in emergency laparotomy care signal need for hospital-level standardization; leaves open whether recent initiatives reduce mortality differences.
More than 1.53 million adults undergo inpatient surgery in the UK NHS. Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery have a much greater risk of death than patients admitted for elective surgery. Widespread variations in key standards of care between hospitals exist and are associated with differences in mortality rates.Recently there have been three large-scale initiatives to improve quality of care for emergency laparotomy patients: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit, the enhanced perioperative care for high-risk patients trial and the Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative. Here we provide a critical review of what we currently know about the use of structured methods for improving the quality of healthcare services, with reference to the three initiatives. We find that using structured methods to improve care is the hallmark of quality improvement but attention must too be paid to the context in which these methods are used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephens et al. (2019) conducted a review in Emergency laparotomy. Structured methods for improving quality of healthcare services was evaluated. Using structured methods to improve care is the hallmark of quality improvement for emergency laparotomy patients, but attention must also be paid to the context in which these methods are used.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: