Key result
Triplane and 4D echocardiographic techniques for assessing longitudinal deformation are not interchangeable, with 2DE and 3PE showing higher agreement (r=0.782) than 2DE and 4DE (r=0.429; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Do different speckle tracking echocardiographic techniques (2DE, 3PE, 4DE) show agreement in assessing left ventricular longitudinal deformation in consecutive subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=101)
Do different speckle tracking echocardiographic techniques (2DE, 3PE, 4DE) show agreement in assessing left ventricular longitudinal deformation in consecutive subjects?
Different echocardiographic techniques for assessing longitudinal deformation (2DE, 3PE, 4DE) are not interchangeable due to significant differences in strain values and moderate agreement.
Techniques for LV longitudinal strain should not be interchanged clinically; Level 4 data leaves open need for standardization and prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal deformation can be assessed with new echocardiographic techniques like triplane echocardiography (3PE) and four-dimensional echocardiography (4DE). We aimed to assess the feasibility, reproducibility, and agreement between these different speckle-tracking techniques for the assessment of longitudinal deformation. METHODS: 101 consecutive subjects underwent echocardiographic examination. 2D cine loops from the apical views, a triplane view, and an LV 4D full volume were acquired in all subjects. LV longitudinal strain was obtained for each imaging modality. RESULTS: 2DE analysis of LV strain was feasible in 90/101 subjects, 3PE strain in 89/101, and 4DE strain in 90/101. The mean value of 2DE and 3PE longitudinal strains was significantly higher with respect to 4DE. The relationship between 2DE and 3PE derived strains (r = 0.782) was significantly higher (z = 3.72, P < 0.001) than that between 2DE and 4DE (r = 0.429) and that between 3PE and 4DE (r = 0.510; z = 3.09, P = 0.001). The mean bias between 2DE and 4DE strains was -6.61 ± 7.31% while -6.42 ± 6.81% between 3PE and 4DE strains; the bias between 2DE and 3PE strain was of 0.21 ± 4.16%. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were acceptable among the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic techniques for the assessment of longitudinal deformation are not interchangeable, and further studies are needed to assess specific reference values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buccheri et al. (2013) reported a cross-sectional. Triplane (3PE) and four-dimensional (4DE) speckle-tracking echocardiography vs. Two-dimensional (2DE) speckle-tracking echocardiography was evaluated on Relationship between 2DE and 3PE derived longitudinal strains (r = 0.782, p=<0.001). Triplane and 4D echocardiographic techniques for assessing longitudinal deformation are not interchangeable, with 2DE and 3PE showing higher agreement (r=0.782) than 2DE and 4DE (r=0.429; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: