Key result
A novel combined echocardiographic method yielded different values and poor agreement compared to standard STE (GS r=0.84, P<.001) and TDI for measuring left ventricular deformation.
Why the study?
A novel technique combining STE and TDI on a single acquisition recently became available, but its feasibility and agreement compared with standard STE and TDI had not been tested in the general population.
Does a novel combined echocardiographic method agree with standard STE and TDI for measuring left ventricular deformation in healthy volunteers?
Cross-Sectional (n=106)
Does a novel combined echocardiographic method agree with standard STE and TDI for measuring left ventricular deformation in healthy volunteers?
A novel combined echocardiographic method for measuring left ventricular deformation shows poor agreement with standard STE and TDI, limiting its clinical utility as a single-acquisition alternative.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urges caution against interchangeable use of novel LV deformation method; leaves open its validity pending further validation.
Background: Currently, two echocardiographic techniques are used to measure deformation: tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Recently, a technique combining STE and TDI (on TDI overlay images) has become available, allowing derivation of STE/TDI results from a single acquisition/reading (combined-STE/combined-TDI). We tested the feasibility and agreement of this novel technique to measure left ventricular deformation in the general population compared to STE and TDI.Methods: We examined a subsample of 106 consecutive subjects of the Asklepios Study, a population-based random sample of male/female volunteers without overt clinical disease (mean age: 55.9 years). Left ventricular deformation measurements were assessed with transthoracic echocardiography using the combined method, STE and TDI.Results: Almost all deformation parameters significantly differed between all methods. Global systolic longitudinal strain (GS) and strain rate (GSRs) values measured by combined-TDI were significantly higher (GS −17.2% ± 3.0, GSRs −0.9 s−1 ± 0.2) compared to TDI (GS −21.1% ± 2.2, GSRs −1.3 s−1 ± 0.2). Measurements by combined-STE were significantly lower (GS −19.1% ± 2.9, GSRs −1.0 s−1 ± 0.2) compared to STE (GS −18.2% ± 3.0, GSRs −0.9 s−1 ± 0.1). Overall, the smallest differences and highest agreement were observed between STE and combined-STE (GS r = 0.84, p < .001; GSRs r = 0.70, p < .001).Conclusions: The comparison of methods showed different values and poor agreement between the echocardiographic modalities. Regrettably, the combined method does not make it possible to obtain in a single image/measurement results that are comparable to STE and TDI data in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
daele et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Without overt clinical disease (n=106). Combined echocardiographic method (combined-STE/combined-TDI) vs. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was evaluated on Global systolic longitudinal strain (GS) measured by combined-STE vs STE (r = 0.84, p=<.001). A novel combined echocardiographic method yielded different values and poor agreement compared to standard STE (GS r=0.84, P<.001) and TDI for measuring left ventricular deformation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: