Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Motivation and instruction are two major substantive domains in educational psychology. Theory and research relevant to each of these domains tend to be diffuse and fragmented. This presents challenges for scholars and practitioners seeking to implement parsimonious and cohesive approaches to help students to learn. This review articulates a two-step integration process that is an illustrative effort towards tackling these challenges and unifying two psycho-educational domains:intra-domain integration (within each of motivation and instruction) andinter-domain integration (between motivation and instruction). With respect to motivation, the Motivation and Engagement Wheel (Martin, 2007) is presented as an example ofintra-domain integration of key facets of motivation (Step 1a). With respect to instruction, Load Reduction Instruction (LRI; Martin, 2016; Martin & Evans, 2018) is an example ofintra-domain integration of explicit instruction and guided independent learning (Step 1b). The review then proposes aninter-domain integration of motivation and instruction (Step 2), arguing that each domain is tied to the other. The joint operation ofintra- andinter-domain integration of motivation and instruction holds potential for more coherent theorizing, measurement, and practical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew J. Martin (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: