Key result
Use of a cCTA-FFRCT strategy to select patients for PCI would result in 32% lower costs and 19% fewer cardiac events at 1 year compared to the standard CAG-visual strategy in Japan.
Why the study?
Does a cCTA-FFRCT guided PCI strategy reduce healthcare costs and improve clinical outcomes compared to visual-guided or invasive FFR-guided strategies in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Does a cCTA-FFRCT guided PCI strategy reduce healthcare costs and improve clinical outcomes compared to visual-guided or invasive FFR-guided strategies in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Non-invasive FFRCT-guided PCI is projected to reduce healthcare costs and improve 1-year clinical outcomes compared to standard visual-guided PCI in Japan.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on fractional flow reserve (FFRcath) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (CAG) results in improved patient outcome and reduced healthcare costs. FFR can now be computed non-invasively from standard coronary CT angiography (cCTA) scans (FFRCT). The purpose of this study is to determine the potential impact of non-invasive FFRCT on costs and clinical outcomes of patients with suspected coronary artery disease in Japan. Clinical data from 254 patients in the HeartFlowNXT trial, costs of goods and services in Japan, and clinical outcome data from the literature were used to estimate the costs and outcomes of 4 clinical pathways: (1) CAG-visual guided PCI, (2) CAG-FFRcath guided PCI, (3) cCTA followed by CAG-visual guided PCI, (4) cCTA-FFRCT guided PCI. The CAG-visual strategy demonstrated the highest projected cost ($10,360) and highest projected 1-year death/myocardial infarction rate (2.4 %). An assumed price for FFRCT of US $2,000 produced equivalent clinical outcomes (death/MI rate: 1.9 %) and healthcare costs ($7,222) for the cCTA-FFRCT strategy and the CAG-FFRcath guided PCI strategy. Use of the cCTA-FFRCT strategy to select patients for PCI would result in 32 % lower costs and 19 % fewer cardiac events at 1 year compared to the most commonly used CAG-visual strategy. Use of cCTA-FFRCT to select patients for CAG and PCI may reduce costs and improve clinical outcome in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in Japan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2014) studied Suspected coronary artery disease (n=254). cCTA-FFRCT guided PCI strategy vs. CAG-visual guided PCI strategy was evaluated on 1-year death or myocardial infarction rate (19% reduction). Use of a cCTA-FFRCT strategy to select patients for PCI would result in 32% lower costs and 19% fewer cardiac events at 1 year compared to the standard CAG-visual strategy in Japan.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: