Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated 197 anaerobic isolates recovered from blood cultures in the period 2009-2013. The isolates included were Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp., Prevotella spp., Fusobacterium spp. and Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC). Identification results by MALDI-TOF MS were compared to those obtained by 16S rRNA sequencing, and the MICs of benzylpenicillin, clindamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and metronidazole were determined by Etests. The MALDI-TOF MS correctly identified 94.9% of the anaerobes to the genus level, and 86.8% to the species level, with errors mainly among the non-fragilis Bacteroides spp. and GPAC. About 73.3% of the isolates were non-susceptible to penicillin, mainly due to high resistance rates in the Bacteroides spp. (99.2%) and Prevotella spp. (69.2%). About 18.5% of the isolates were clindamycin resistant. Piperacillin-tazobactam had an excellent activity against all anaerobes except the non-fragilis Bacteroides spp., of which 43.8% were non-susceptible. The clinical significance of such a high resistance rate is unclear. Meropenem and metronidazole were the most active antibiotics, with 96.9% and 97.9% of the isolates being susceptible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handal et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: