Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expert review highlights the impact of frailty assessment in Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting improved safety and personalization for disease-modifying therapies.
The introduction of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD-DMTs) is reshaping clinical practice, raising critical questions about patient selection, diagnostic pathways, treatment appropriateness, and equity of access. Frailty, a multidimensional condition of reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, is common in older adults with AD, yet has not been systematically assessed in AD-DMTs trials, limiting the generalizability of trial findings to real-world populations. In this review, we examine the role of frailty in the emerging era of AD-DMTs, summarizing evidence on its prevalence and prognostic relevance, approaches to its assessment, and its potential impact on treatment safety and effectiveness. We propose that regular frailty assessment should inform decision-making in both clinical trials and clinical practice, while frailty-informed management—including medication review and multidomain interventions—may support more appropriate, individualized care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: