Key result
Frailty-informed framework integrates life expectancy and time-to-benefit to guide proportional prescribing in older HF patients.
Why the study?
In older adults with heart failure, frailty, and multimorbidity, trial-demonstrated therapeutic efficacy may not translate into meaningful clinical benefit, creating tension between guideline-driven care and goal-concordant prescribing.
Introduces the concept of temporal therapeutic mismatch to guide frailty-informed prescribing and deprescribing in older adults with heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide goal-concordant prescribing in frail older HF patients; leaves open prospective validation of the proposed framework.
Heart failure in older adults increasingly occurs in the context of frailty, multimorbidity, and declining physiological reserve. In this population, therapeutic efficacy demonstrated in selected clinical trial populations does not automatically translate into meaningful clinical benefit. This discrepancy may create tension between guideline-driven care and goal-concordant prescribing. This narrative review proposes a conceptual framework to distinguish therapeutic efficacy from clinical relevance in ageing heart failure populations. Using tafamidis for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and apixaban for atrial fibrillation as illustrative paradigms, we examine how frailty severity, competing risks, life expectancy, and therapy-specific time-to-benefit influence the likelihood that a treatment will provide meaningful benefit for an individual patient. Disease-modifying therapies with delayed benefit may lose proportionality when lag-time-to-benefit exceeds the patient’s anticipated window of preserved survival or functional autonomy. In contrast, preventive strategies that rapidly reduce autonomy-threatening events may retain broader clinical relevance across vulnerability strata, although individualized reassessment remains essential. We introduce the concept of temporal therapeutic mismatch, defined as a situation in which expected therapeutic benefit occurs beyond the patient’s remaining functional trajectory or life expectancy. A pragmatic framework integrating frailty severity, estimated life expectancy, competing risks, therapy-specific time-to-benefit, and patient-defined goals is proposed to support proportional prescribing. In ageing cardiovascular populations, high-quality care requires moving beyond efficacy alone toward frailty-informed clinical relevance. Structured reassessment—including consideration of non-initiation or deprescribing when appropriate—represents a key component of patient-centered cardiovascular care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esser et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. A proposed framework integrates frailty severity, life expectancy, and therapy-specific time-to-benefit to support proportional prescribing in older adults with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: