Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates enhanced azo dye removal and reduced fouling in a membrane bioreactor with biochar, indicating improved wastewater treatment efficiency.
This study investigated the use of biochar as an adsorbent in an anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor treating azo dye-containing wastewater. Three strategies were evaluated: (1) conventional reactor operation, (2) biochar addition to the mixed liquor, and (3) post-treatment using a fixed-bed biochar adsorption column. COD removal remained high (>98%) in strategies 1 and 2, indicating that biochar did not affect organic matter removal. Respirometric assays showed higher heterotrophic activity during the biochar-amended period, with the specific oxygen uptake rate increasing from 8.6 ± 0.7 to 10 ± 1.1 mg O 2 g -1 MLVSS h -1 . Biochar incorporation improved dye removal (79.1% to 89.2%) and UVA254 reduction (38.1% to 45.5%). Batch assays showed that the dye removal rate increased from 0.64 to 1.79 mg RBV-5R gVSS⁻¹ h⁻¹ during the biochar-amended period. Concurrently, membrane fouling was significantly mitigated, with an 87% reduction in fouling rate, accompanied by improved sludge filterability, as reflected by lower sCOD, CST, and SRF values. The highest effluent quality was achieved with post-treatment, resulting in 98.1% dye removal and 73.5% UVA254 reduction. Overall, in-reactor biochar improved dye removal, enhanced heterotrophic activity, and mitigated membrane fouling, whereas post- treatment provided additional polishing of residual dye, color, and aromatic compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lunelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: