Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual synthesis demonstrates divergent autoimmune and oncogenic trajectories across tissue compartments, suggesting microbial disease valence is not fixed.
Background. Certain microorganisms are associated, in different patients or tissue contexts, with both immune-mediated disease and malignancy. These pairings are usually treated as unrelated associations, as if the microorganism itself carried a fixed pathological sign. Hypothesis. We propose that microbial valence is not intrinsic to the agent. We define microbial valence operationally as the direction of pathological consequence generated by a microbial exposure within a specified host–compartment context. The sign emerges from the interaction among microbial effector repertoire, Access, compartment, host Recognition/Discrimination, and the Amplification loop that follows. Framework. We formalize two sister compartmental grammars: ARA (Access–Recognition–Amplification) for autoimmune trajectories and ADA (Access–Discrimination–Amplification; not adenosine deaminase) for oncogenic trajectories. Six microorganisms are used as a structured case bank: Campylobacter jejuni, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), Helicobacter pylori, Porphyromonas gingivalis, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HTLV-1. Results of the conceptual synthesis. The cases resolve into four recurrent mechanisms—effector switch, same-effector contextual switch, discrimination switch, and temporal valence transition—and support five falsifiable predictions. The evidence is intentionally graded rather than homogenized: C. jejuni, EBV, and H. pylori serve as primary anchors; P. gingivalis as a strong supporting case; HCV as a temporal bridge; and HTLV-1 as a boundary stress-test. Conclusion. The microorganism does not carry the disease class. It carries a repertoire of potential perturbations; disease class emerges from the compartmental trajectory those perturbations enter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Añaños et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: