Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review categorizes deep learning image data hiding across three functional paradigms, highlighting persistent deployment and benchmarking barriers.
This survey presents a structured review of deep learning-based techniques for image data hiding, proposing a three-paradigm taxonomy organized by the method’s operational relationship to the carrier image. We classify existing methods into modification-based, synthesis-based, and logic-based approaches. In the modification-based tier, we trace the architectural progression from foundational Convolutional Neural Networks and Generative Adversarial Networks to high-capacity Invertible Neural Networks and Transformers, analyzing their distinct trade-offs between embedding capacity, imperceptibility, and robustness. In the synthesis-based tier, we examine how Diffusion Probabilistic Models and generative adversarial frameworks reframe data hiding as a carrier generation problem rather than a pixel editing task. This paradigm encompasses both generative steganography (where carriers are synthesized from scratch) and proactive watermarking (where provenance is embedded during AI content generation). In the logic-based tier, we review zero-watermarking and coverless steganography, where ownership is established through feature extraction and semantic mapping without modifying any image, a critical property for sensitive domains such as medical imaging. Finally, we identify four persistent infrastructure gaps: benchmarking fragmentation, narrow robustness evaluation, domain generalization failures, and computational infeasibility that prevent real-world deployment despite architectural progress, and we propose concrete research directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janok et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: