Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mechanistic study reveals hydroxyl radical-driven carbon corrosion pathways during aqueous graphene exfoliation, indicating strategies to suppress material loss.
Aqueous electrochemical anodic exfoliation offers a promising route for scalable graphene production owing to its environmental friendliness and green nature. However, carbon corrosion causes substantial carbon loss, hindering its practical application. Herein, a custom-designed electrolyzer with the physically isolated anode and cathode was developed to enable unambiguous tracking of carbon corrosion pathways. Through combined experimental and theoretical investigations, a multi-pathway carbon corrosion mechanism is revealed. The total carbon loss rate increases with decreasing voltage or increasing temperature, reaching 54% at 15 V and 70 °C, with low graphene selectivity (7.0%) and yield (5.7%). Notably, carbon corrosion primarily yields CO2 and CO, accounting for up to 89% of total carbon loss with a CO2:CO volume ratio of 7.4–9.7:1, along with minor hydrocarbon and soluble organic species. ·OH radicals, coexisting with SO4·–, serve as the key active species driving carbon oxidation. DFT calculations reveal that the ·OH-mediated oxidation of edge carbon exhibits a lower energy barrier via hydroxylation–oxidation–cleavage to form CO/CO2 than that of in-plane defective carbon, accompanied by more significant charge transfer and electronic structure modulation after hydroxyl adsorption. This work elucidates the multi-pathway carbon corrosion mechanism and provides insights for minimizing carbon loss in sustainable graphene production by electrochemical exfoliation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: