Cross-sectional study demonstrates positive links between autonomy-supportive care, medication adherence, and life satisfaction in adolescents with epilepsy, highlighting the importance of...
Adolescence is a critical developmental period in which epilepsy can affect both health behaviors and psychological well-being. However, clinical indicators alone do not fully capture adolescents’ lived experience. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study examined the cross-sectional associations among autonomy-supportive healthcare (ASH) environments, medication adherence, and life satisfaction in adolescents with epilepsy. A cross-sectional design was used with 1219 Italian adolescents with epilepsy (M age = 15.58, SD = 1.72), recruited through pediatric neurology clinics and national patient support organizations. Participants completed validated self-report measures: the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ) for ASH, the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) for medication adherence, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) for life satisfaction. A mediation model was tested to evaluate the indirectly associated paths among the variables. The mediation model showed a good fit to the data (χ2/df = 2.45, CFI = 0.994, RMSEA = 0.034, SRMR = 0.029). ASH was positively associated with both medication adherence (β = 0.40, p < 0.001) and life satisfaction (β = 0.23, p < 0.001), while medication adherence was positively associated with life satisfaction (β = 0.35, p < 0.001). The indirect statistical path from ASH to life satisfaction through medication adherence was also significant (β = 0.08, p < 0.001), indicating partial mediation. Overall, these findings highlight positive cross-sectional links between ASH environments, medication adherence, and psychological well-being in adolescents with epilepsy, underscoring the potential relevance of relational aspects of care in chronic disease management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verrastro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: