Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical modeling demonstrates cyclic stress and failure boundaries in rock energy storage caverns, highlighting the role of lateral pressure in guiding safe operating limits.
Compressed air energy storage (CAES) in hard-rock caverns involves excavation, support installation, first charging, and long-term cyclic charging and discharging. These engineering stages produce different elastoplastic mechanisms, especially under non-hydrostatic in-situ stress. A semi-analytical formulation is developed for a circular cavern under biaxial far-field stress. The solution distinguishes unloading-stage plasticity, an intermediate elastic state, and loading-stage plasticity, and derives the corresponding stress and displacement fields by combining the Kolosov–Muskhelishvili complex-variable elastic solution, the Mohr–Coulomb criterion, radial plastic equilibrium, and non-associated flow. Continuity of radial stress and displacement is enforced at the elastic–plastic (EP) interface, allowing excavation and pressurisation to be treated within one path-dependent formulation. The results show that the lateral pressure coefficient governs both plastic-zone extent and the direction in which yielding and deformation concentrate. Comparison between the loading-side Mohr–Coulomb shear threshold and the tensile cut-off pressure gives failure-initiation pressure envelopes for different confinement and strength conditions. A cyclic damage calculation is then used to estimate progressive degradation, residual displacement, and the maximum allowable operating pressure that considers accumulated damage during long-term operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: