Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates robust factor structure and diagnostic accuracy for the ED-15 in treatment seekers, supporting its routine clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the factor structure, measurement invariance, and discriminative ability of the Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) questionnaire in a large transdiagnostic clinical population of treatment-seeking adults. METHOD: = 30.73 years; 77.0% women; 71.1% in Australia) seeking mental health treatment across different settings of routine clinical practice. After initial completion of the ED-15, subsamples completed additional measures within ±365 days of the initial ED-15 and/or repeated the ED-15 at least 7 days later. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported both the hypothesized two-factor and a bi-factor model (with a general factor), with the two-factor model retained as the preferred structure, consistent with theory and prior research. The ED-15 also demonstrated strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In subsamples, there was preliminary evidence of measurement invariance across gender, time, country, and to a lesser extent age group. Correlations supported good concurrent validity with eating disorder pathology and eating-related impairment, while convergent validity was mixed, with moderate associations with psychological distress and maladaptive perfectionism, but weak or negligible associations with personal standards perfectionism and autism-related traits. Receiver operating characteristic analyses deriving an optimal diagnostic cut-off indicated good discriminative validity, with the ED-15 discriminating probable eating disorder caseness. DISCUSSION: Findings add to the growing evidence on the ED-15's latent structure and provide preliminary support for measurement invariance, supporting its use as a brief, psychometrically sound tool in routine clinical practice. Future research should evaluate its intended use for session-by-session monitoring of eating disorder symptom change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pennesi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: