Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Participatory field study demonstrates enhanced drug-risk awareness and heritage engagement in rural youth, highlighting local cultural traditions as effective community health interventions.
This article examines how culturally grounded creation processes can contribute to youth drug prevention in a Thai Puan community in Nakhon Nayok, Thailand. Working with Pratomsuksa 5–6 and Mattayom 1–3 students at Banbungke School, the research team combined documentary review with a participatory field study to co-develop a Lam Puan–based cultural intervention. Analysis of the project design and implementation yielded a six-step cultural creation model: (1) compile community-sourced cultural and risk data; (2) define scope and objectives; (3) select an output format grounded in community knowledge; (4) co-design and develop content and material components; (5) prototype and iterate through trials and feedback; and (6) deliver and evaluate with stakeholders. Stakeholder roles spanned school administrators, teachers, students, local leaders, guardians, culture bearers, and a university team, with community members participating as co-producers and co-evaluators. Process evaluation indicated concurrent gains in drug-risk knowledge, heritage language use, and intergenerational engagement. Implications include a portable, community-owned method for mobilizing intangible heritage as social prevention infrastructure; practical guidance for universities integrating teaching, research, and service; and a replicable template for policy actors seeking culturally responsive approaches to youth well-being that protect and revitalize local culture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makpa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: