Proof-of-concept study demonstrates high technical performance and pedagogical fit for an AI systematic review agent in nursing education, indicating feasibility as an instructional scaffold.
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may support systematic review learning, but general-purpose chatbots and workflow tools do not explicitly teach methodological reasoning. Purpose: To develop a stage-structured retrieval-augmented generation learning agent and assess its perceived pedagogical fit and technical performance. Methods: The tool combined planning, query rewriting, iterative retrieval, and context-sufficiency checking across 6 stages: topic selection, review question framing, search strategy, screening and management, critical appraisal and data extraction, and synthesis and reporting. Six nurse educators and 4 undergraduate nursing students completed author-developed questionnaires assessing perceived pedagogical fit and AI performance. Results: The tool generated stage-aligned guidance across the review process. Participants reported moderate perceived pedagogical fit ( M = 3.90, standard deviation = 0.45) and high perceived AI performance ( M = 4.00, standard deviation = 0.25); personalization required improvement. Conclusions: The tool was feasible as an instructional scaffold, but findings reflect perceptions from a small sample. Larger studies should assess objective learning outcomes, methodological accuracy, and responsible AI use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: