Geotechnical modeling study finds slope geometry and loading drive stability over root reinforcement in fine-grained soils, suggesting vegetation benefits depend heavily on site conditions.
Slope stability in vegetated hillslopes depends on groundwater, geometry, external loading, soil properties, and root reinforcement. This study evaluated a low-plasticity clayey silt (CL–ML) from Loja, Ecuador, under bare soil, Eucalyptus, Pine, Vetiver, and Kikuyu covers. Direct shear tests on root-containing specimens provided equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters for limit-equilibrium and PLAXIS 2D strength-reduction analyses considering three slope geometries and three loading conditions: elevated groundwater, groundwater plus an 8 kN m−2 surcharge, and groundwater, surcharge, and pseudo-static loading. The resulting 90 factor-of-safety values were assessed using scenario-based factorial ANOVA and MANOVA. Geometry and loading explained 41.4% and 35.0% of total variance, respectively, whereas numerical method explained 1.1%. Limit-equilibrium factors of safety were 5.4% higher on average than PLAXIS 2D values. The vegetation-cover main effect was small and marginal (η2 = 1.5%, p = 0.051), while significant cover–loading and cover–method interactions indicated a scenario- and method-dependent response. Under pseudo-static loading, Vetiver and Kikuyu showed the highest PLAXIS 2D factors of safety, whereas LEM results remained narrowly grouped, precluding a general ranking of vegetation effectiveness. These findings support scenario-specific evaluation of equivalent root reinforcement in slope-stabilization design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: