Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimization study demonstrates reduced replenishment costs and energy consumption in inland electric vessels under time-of-use pricing, suggesting viable pathways for clean maritime transport.
Battery-powered propulsion offers a pathway for reducing inland shipping emissions. However, low battery energy density limits sailing range and may require energy replenishment during a voyage, thereby complicating energy and voyage planning for inland electric vessels. Time-of-use (TOU) pricing creates cost-saving opportunities but further complicates planning because energy replenishment and sailing speed are closely coupled. This study develops a joint optimization framework for an inland electric vessel under TOU pricing that determines replenishment ports, technologies, amounts, and leg-specific sailing speeds to minimize total replenishment costs. The problem is formulated as a mixed-integer nonlinear programming model and reformulated as a mixed-integer linear programming approximation through equivalent linearization and speed discretization. A Yangtze River case study with five operating conditions evaluates the proposed framework. The results show that, under the proposed framework, TOU pricing reduces total replenishment costs by 42.4–43.4% compared to fixed pricing. Relative to a sailing-speed optimization benchmark, joint optimization under TOU pricing reduces replenishment costs by 9.8–12.5% and energy consumption by 4.2–5.6%. The cost-saving potential also varies with the voyage time limit, voyage start time, relative charging and battery swapping rates, and the availability of opportunity charging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: