Simulation study demonstrates reduced non-working headland space in irregular agricultural fields, suggesting improved coverage path planning for autonomous machinery.
Fixed full-boundary headlands create redundant non-working space in irregular fields, while working direction and swath offset jointly affect coverage quality and inter-swath turning cost. This study proposes a dynamic-headland-aware coverage path planning framework that allocates headland space according to swath endpoints and turning demand and generates parallel working swaths and Bézier U-turns for each direction–offset candidate. Field-specific empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF)-midrank normalization converts turning distance, coverage error, and headland ratio into relative quality scores, and DQN-SHADE searches the resulting non-smooth discrete evaluation landscape. In geometric simulations on 24 actual field boundaries, DQN-SHADE achieved the lowest mean gap to the discrete reference optimum (0.0034) and the highest threshold success rate, SR5×10−3, of 80.83% among six stochastic optimizers under a common candidate-evaluation budget. Relative to fixed full-boundary headlands, dynamic headland allocation reduced the mean headland ratio from 13.30% to 7.52%, increased retained working area by 16,378.23 m2 per field, and maintained 98.16% mean coverage. The proposed framework improves field-space utilization while maintaining coverage quality and geometric feasibility under the evaluated simulation conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: