Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
and DFT methods are capable of describing excited states with good accuracy in many cases, the investigation of dynamical processes and the need to sample the phase space in complex systems often requires methods with reduced computational costs but still sufficient accuracy. In the present work, we report the derivation and implementation of analytical nuclear gradients for time-dependent long-range corrected density functional tight binding (TD-LC-DFTB) in the DFTB+ program. The accuracy of the TD-LC-DFTB potential-energy surfaces is benchmarked for excited-state geometries and adiabatic as well as vertical transition energies. The benchmark set consists of more than 100 organic molecules taken as subsets from available benchmark sets. The reported method yields a mean deviation of 0.31 eV for adiabatic excitation energies with respect to CC2. In order to study more subtle effects, seminumerical second derivatives based on the analytical gradients are employed to simulate vibrationally resolved UV/vis spectra. This extensive test exhibits few problematic cases, which can be traced back to the parametrization of the repulsive potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sokolov et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: