Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ceramic samples of (1− x )SrTiO 3 - x SrMg 1/3 Nb 2/3 O 3 and (1− x )SrTiO 3 - x SrSc 1/2 Ta 1/2 O 3 were prepared, and their dielectric properties were studied at x =0.005–0.15 and 0.01–0.1, respectively, at frequencies 10 Hz–1 MHz and at temperatures 4.2–350 K. A giant dielectric relaxation was observed in the temperature range 150–300 K, and not so strong but well-developed relaxation was found in the temperature range 20–90 K. The activation energy U and the relaxation time τ 0 were determined to be 0.21–0.3 eV and from 10 −11 to 10 −12 s for the high-temperature relaxation and 0.01–0.02 eV and 10 −8 –10 −10 s for the low-temperature relaxation, respectively. The additional local charge compensation of the heterovalent impurities Mg 2+ and Nb 5+ (or Sc 3+ and Ta 5+ ) by free charge carriers or the host ion vacancies is suggested to be the underlying physical mechanism of the relaxation phenomena. On the basis of this mechanism, the Maxwell-Wagner model and the model of reorienting dipole centers Mg 2+ (or Sc 3+ ) associated with the oxygen vacancy are proposed to explain the high-temperature relaxation with some arguments in favor of the latter model. The polaron-like model with the Nb 5+ -Ti 3+ center is suggested as the origin of the low-temperature relaxation. The reasons for the absence of ferroelectric phase transitions in the solid solutions under study are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemanov et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: