Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: complex (MAC) lung disease. Methods: Structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and known-groups validity were assessed using data from the ARISE (NCT04677543) and ENCORE (NCT04677569) phase 3 trials. Convergent validity was assessed using Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), EXACT Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale. Anchor-based meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were estimated using the Patient Global Impression of Severity Respiratory scale. Results: In total, 362 patients were included for cross-sectional (ARISE: 97, ENCORE: 265) and longitudinal (ARISE: 99) validation analyses. Modern psychometric methods supported item relevance and an essentially unidimensional mean score. The respiratory symptom score demonstrated adequate internal consistency (McDonald's omega: 0.86, Cronbach's alpha: 0.81), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.73), convergent validity (EXACT: -0.72, E-RS: -0.72, SGRQ: -0.77, FACIT-Fatigue: 0.51), and known-groups validity. The estimated MWPC threshold was a 16.67-point median change from baseline (95% CI: 8.33-16.83 points). Conclusions: The respiratory symptom score is a robust, sensitive, and responsive measure of respiratory symptoms in adults with a new or recurrent MAC lung disease diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serrano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: