Key result
CMV immunoglobulins used as rescue therapy in lung transplant recipients resulted in no recurrence of CMV infection or disease in 68% and 66% of patients, respectively, with minimal side effects.
Why the study?
Does the use of CMV immunoglobulins provide a safe and effective rescue therapy for CMV infection in lung transplant recipients?
Observational (n=22)
Yes
Does the use of CMV immunoglobulins provide a safe and effective rescue therapy for CMV infection in lung transplant recipients?
CMV immunoglobulins may serve as a safe and effective last-resort treatment for CMV infection in lung transplant recipients experiencing adverse effects from standard antiviral drugs.
May support CMVIG as rescue option in antiviral-intolerant lung recipients; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm benefit.
RATIONAL: Pending the authorization of new anti-CMV drugs with fewer adverse effects, exploring the possibilities offered by CMV immunoglobulins (CMVIG) seems necessary. In France, access to CMVIG requires official authorization by the national Health authority and is restricted to second line rescue therapy for CMV infection/disease. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study is to describe the indications and clinical situations that justified its use in France. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study included 22 lung transplant patients over a 3-year period. Data on clinical indication, tolerance and efficacy were collected. RESULTS: The main indication for CMVIG initiation, which was documented in 17 of them (82%) was complex clinical situations resulting from side effects to antiviral drug. CMVIG indication was documented as treatment for 15 patients (68%) and as a secondary prophylaxis for 7 patients (32%). Only one side effect (pruritus during infusion with no anaphylactic symptoms) attributable to CMVIG was reported. After CMVIG initiation, no recurrence of infection or disease was observed during a median follow-up of 174 (12-682) days after treatment initiation for respectively 68% and 66% of the patients. CONCLUSION: This study describes an unusual indication of CMVIG use as a last resort treatment in complex situations, based on clinical needs. CMVIG could be useful to change the course of CMV infection with minimal adverse effects or comorbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2021) conducted an observational in CMV infection/disease in lung transplant recipients (n=22). CMV immunoglobulins (CMVIG) was evaluated on no recurrence of CMV infection. CMV immunoglobulins used as rescue therapy in lung transplant recipients resulted in no recurrence of CMV infection or disease in 68% and 66% of patients, respectively, with minimal side effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: