This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The in-depth imaging properties of two-photon excitation microscopy were investigated and compared with those of confocal microscopy. Confocal imaging enabled the recording of images from dental biofilm down to a depth of 40 microm, while two-photon excitation images could be recorded at depths greater than 100 microm. Two-photon excitation point spread functions (PSFs) were recorded at depths ranging from 0 to 90 microm depth using 220-nm diameter fluorescent beads immersed in water. PSFs were measured using both a high numerical aperture oil immersion objective and a water immersion objective. The experiments carried out using the oil immersion objective showed a rapid degradation of both the axial and lateral resolution due to spherical aberrations. In addition, the detected fluorescence intensity rapidly decreased as a function of depth. The experiments carried out using the water immersion objective showed no significant degradation of both the axial and lateral resolution and the fluorescence intensity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerritsen et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: