Key result
Office blood pressure measurement significantly overestimated the systolic blood pressure response to antihypertensive monotherapy by an average of 4.6 mm Hg compared with home blood pressure measurement.
Why the study?
Does the method of blood pressure measurement (office, home, ambulatory) affect the assessed antihypertensive response to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
RCT (n=418)
Randomized to atenolol 50 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg daily
Yes
Does the method of blood pressure measurement (office, home, ambulatory) affect the assessed antihypertensive response to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
Office blood pressure significantly overestimates the antihypertensive response to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide compared to home and ambulatory blood pressure, potentially leading to less aggressive treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Office BP-guided monotherapy risks undertreatment; challenges reliance on office measurements alone for assessing drug response in trials and practice.
Office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) demonstrate variable associations with outcomes. The authors sought to compare office BP (OBP), home BP (HBP), and ambulatory BP (ABP) for measuring responses to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), atenolol, and their combination. After completing washout, eligible patients were randomized to atenolol 50 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg daily. Doses were doubled after 3 weeks and the alternate drug was added after 6 weeks if BP was >120/70 mm Hg (chosen to allow maximum opportunity to assess genetic associations with dual BP therapy in the parent study). OBP (in triplicate), HBP (twice daily for 5 days), and 24-hour ABP were measured at baseline, after monotherapy, and after combination therapy. BP responses were compared between OBP, HBP, and ABP for each monotherapy and combination therapy. In 418 patients, OBP overestimated BP response compared with HBP, with an average 4.6 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic BP (P<.0001) and 2.1 mm Hg greater reduction in diastolic BP (P<.0001) across all therapies. Results were similar for atenolol and HCTZ monotherapy. ABP response was more highly correlated with HBP response (r=0.58) than with OBP response (r=0.47; P=.04). In the context of a randomized clinical trial, the authors have identified significant differences in HBP, OBP, and ABP methods of measuring BP response to atenolol and HCTZ monotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beitelshees et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Mild to moderate essential hypertension (n=418). Office Blood Pressure (OBP) measurement vs. Home Blood Pressure (HBP) measurement was evaluated on Difference in systolic blood pressure reduction between office and home measurements after monotherapy (MD 4.6 mm Hg, 95% CI 3.3-5.9, p=<0.001). Office blood pressure measurement significantly overestimated the systolic blood pressure response to antihypertensive monotherapy by an average of 4.6 mm Hg compared with home blood pressure measurement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: