Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
C2H6/C2H4 separation is one of the most crucial processes in the chemical industry and currently practiced by energy‐intensive distillation technology. As an alternative, adsorption‐based separation is considered as technically feasible and economically viable, and there has been considerable interest to develop advanced adsorbents for C2H6/C2H4 separation. In this study, we computationally screen a large set (12020) of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) to identify top‐performing candidates for selective adsorption of C2H6 over C2H4. Quantitative relationships are established between the adsorption performance metrics (C2H6 working capacity and C2H6/C2H4 selectivity) and the structural descriptors (pore size, surface area, and porosity), as well as isosteric heat. We identify 16 top‐performing MOFs with C2H6/C2H4 selectivity ≥ 2.16 and C2H6 working capacity ≥ 0.54 mol/kg, which are superior to a benchmarked MOF (ZJU‐120a). It is revealed that pore geometry (both size and shape) are the key factors governing C2H6‐selective adsorption. From topological analysis, the most common topologies are found. Finally, six design strategies are proposed: regulating topology, catenating framework, adding aromatic ring, pillar‐layering framework, substituting metal node, and imposing flexibility. Each strategy is elaborated with examples for boosting separation performance. These strategies offer bottom‐up guidelines for the rational design of new MOFs towards high‐performance C2H6/C2H4 separation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: