Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The major function of a classification of neoplasms is to correlate with prognosis. During the 1980s two trends developed in the classification of gliomas: 1) the presence of necrosis in astrocytomas defines a subset with the worst prognosis (glioblastoma multiforme) and 2) no comparable subset of oligodendroglioma appears to exist, either histologically or prognostically. Even the worst of the oligodendrogliomas has a better prognosis than glioblastomas. These asymmetries must be kept in mind when one is considering the diagnosis of glioblastoma. The absence of a specific stain for oligodendrogliomas, the difficulty in differentiating small anaplastic cells from oligodendroglial cells and the common occurrence of mixtures of normal and/or reactive oligodendroglia and astrocytes in gliomas combine to create potentially confusing misclassification of many gliomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellsworth C. Alvord (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: