Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 1978PEDIATRICS

Evaluating Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques: A Comparison of Three Systems in Infants and Children

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Arteriosonde 1010 performed better than Infrasonde 3000 for indirect blood pressure measurement, while the Pedisphyg system yielded accurate systolic values compared to intra-arterial pressure.

Why the study?

Do indirect blood pressure measuring devices (Arteriosonde 1010, Infrasonde 3000, Pedisphyg system) accurately measure systemic arterial blood pressure compared to direct intra-arterial measurement in infants and children?

Population

Infants and children

Comparison

Indirect blood pressure measurement using… vs Direct intra-arterial pressure measurement

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

RRRobert F. RederStevens Institute of TechnologyIDIvan DimichMount Sinai HospitalMCMyron L. CohenStevens Institute of Technology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Pedisphyg may aid systolic BP assessment in infants and children; leaves open optimal device selection pending prospective validation.

Study Design

Type

Observational

Structured PICO

Do indirect blood pressure measuring devices (Arteriosonde 1010, Infrasonde 3000, Pedisphyg system) accurately measure systemic arterial blood pressure compared to direct intra-arterial measurement in infants and children?

P
Population
Infants and children
E
Exposure
Indirect blood pressure measurement using Arteriosonde 1010, Infrasonde 3000, or Pedisphyg system
C
Comparator
Direct intra-arterial pressure measurement
O
Outcome
Systemic arterial blood pressure (systolic and diastolic)surrogate

Among indirect blood pressure devices in infants and children, Pedisphyg accurately measures systolic pressure, while Arteriosonde and Infrasonde only approximate direct intra-arterial pressures.

Cite This Study

Reder et al. (1978) reported an observational. Indirect blood pressure measuring devices (Arteriosonde 1010, Infrasonde 3000, Pedisphyg system) vs. Direct intra-arterial pressure measurement was evaluated on Systemic arterial blood pressure accuracy. Arteriosonde 1010 performed better than Infrasonde 3000 for indirect blood pressure measurement, while the Pedisphyg system yielded accurate systolic values compared to intra-arterial pressure.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9d68cf0169ac98b246dc0bhttps://doi.org/10.1542/peds.62.3.326
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical evaluation and comparison of the Infrasonde, Arteriosonde, and mercury sphygmomanometer in measurement of blood pressure in children.1979 · 28 citations
  2. 2Which pressure to believe? A comparison of direct arterial with indirect blood pressure measurement techniques in the pediatric intensive care unit2011 · 55 citations
  3. 3Assessment of Doppler ultrasound to measure systolic and diastolic blood pressures in infants and young children.1975 · 32 citations
  4. 4Comparison of Indirect and Direct Methods of Measuring Arterial Blood Pressure1954 · 196 citations
  5. 5Assessment of the Accuracy of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements.1997 · 29 citations