Key result
Patients with placenta accreta had a significantly lower mean uterine artery pulsatility index compared to those with placenta previa alone (0.51 vs 0.57; P=0.002).
Why the study?
Does uterine artery Doppler velocimetry improve the diagnosis of placenta accreta in patients with placenta previa?
Observational (n=11,210)
Does uterine artery Doppler velocimetry improve the diagnosis of placenta accreta in patients with placenta previa?
Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry measuring pulsatility index, combined with a history of cesarean delivery, improves the diagnostic accuracy for placenta accreta in patients with placenta previa.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lower PI may aid accreta diagnosis in previa; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential value of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in diagnosing placenta accreta. METHODS: Clinical records of all deliveries between April 1991 and March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Cases of intrauterine growth restriction, pregnancy-induced hypertension, multiple pregnancies, fetal anomalies, chromosomal abnormalities, and maternal medical illnesses such as cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and diabetes mellitus were excluded. A total of 11,210 cases were evaluated, including 403 cases of placenta previa without accreta (placenta previa) and 39 cases of placenta previa with accreta (placenta accreta). All patients underwent uterine artery Doppler velocimetry to measure the mean resistive index and pulsatility index (PI) in the third trimester. The analysis included participant characteristics such as age, parity, abortion history, previous cesarean delivery, gestational age at delivery, neonatal sex, and birth weight. RESULTS: The mean uterine artery PI was significantly lower in the placenta accreta group compared to previa alone (0.51 versus 0.57; P = .002). The odds ratios for placenta accreta were 2.4 for 2 or more previous abortions (P = .011) and 5.3 and 7.0 for 1 and 2 or more previous cesarean deliveries (P = .001 and .005). With an increase in the mean PI by 0.01, the odds ratio for placenta accreta decreased by 0.94 (P < .001). The area under the receive operating characteristic curve was 0.72 for previous cesarean delivery alone, increasing to 0.77 with the combination of the mean PI and previous cesarean delivery (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the mean PI measured by uterine artery Doppler velocimetry is reduced in patients with placenta accreta compared to those without accreta. The diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta can be potentially improved if uterine artery Doppler values and the history of cesarean delivery are combined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Placenta accreta (n=11,210). Placenta accreta vs. Placenta previa without accreta was evaluated on Mean uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) (p=.002). Patients with placenta accreta had a significantly lower mean uterine artery pulsatility index compared to those with placenta previa alone (0.51 vs 0.57; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: