Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transition metal oxides have gained attention as promising oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts in alkaline electrolytes, but heterogeneities in typical catalyst samples often obscure key structure–property relationships that are essential for developing higher performance materials. Here, we have combined ultrahigh vacuum surface science techniques, electrochemical measurements, and density functional theory (DFT) to quantify structure-dependent OER activity in a series of well-defined electrocatalysts. We describe a direct correlation between the population of Fe edge-site atoms and the OER activity of ultrathin Fe 2 O 3 nanostructures (∼0.5 nm apparent height) grown on Au(111) substrates. Hydroxylated Fe atoms residing at edge-sites along the catalyst/support interface were spectroscopically identified as key reaction centers, and these Fe edge-site atoms were estimated to produce OER turnover frequencies approximately 150 times higher than that of Fe atoms on the catalyst surface at an applied potential of 1.8 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode. Impressively, ultrathin Fe 2 O 3 /Au nanostructures with a high density of catalytically active Fe edge-site atoms outperformed an ultrathin IrO x /Au catalyst at moderate overpotentials. DFT calculations revealed more favorable OER at edge sites along the Fe 2 O 3 /Au interface, with lower predicted overpotentials due to beneficial modification of intermediate binding. Our results demonstrate how a combination of surface science, electrochemistry, and computational modeling can be used to identify key structure–property relationships in a well-defined electrocatalytic system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kauffman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: