Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ex vivo experimental study demonstrates localized vascular constriction under elevated venous pressure in isolated rabbit ears, indicating local or myogenic regulation independent of central...
Simultaneous outflow and inflow rates with a constant driving pressure but varying hydrostatic (venous outflow) pressure were measured in 37 isolated ears perfused with Ringer-Locke solution. Flow increased as the hydrostatic pressure was raised (due to passive distension of the vessels) but in six cases there was a decrease in both inflow and outflow at the highest hydrostatic pressures. As hydrostatic pressure was raised outflow fell below inflow, indicating increased capillary filtration, and this complicated the interpretation. It was concluded that in less than half the cases there may have been a ‘veno-vasomotor reflex’ to raised venous pressure. Evidence of the reflex was definite in six (15%) of the cases. The results cannot distinguish between a ‘reflex’ or a possible ‘myogenic effect,’ but do show that it can occur without central nervous connections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burton et al. (1956) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: