Key result
Private patient status was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of receiving catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation compared to public patient status (HR 2.65).
Why the study?
To investigate clinical and health system factors associated with receiving catheter ablation for non-valvular AF.
Observational (n=46,764)
Hazard Ratio: 2.65 (95% CI 2.35–2.97)
In Australia, private health insurance status and higher socioeconomic advantage are strong non-clinical predictors for receiving catheter ablation and early ablation for atrial fibrillation, highlighting potential inequities in healthcare access.
May signal insurance-driven AF ablation disparities; leaves open whether policy changes can improve equitable access.
Objective: To investigate clinical and health system factors associated with receiving catheter ablation (CA) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Study Design and Setting: We used hospital administrative data linked with death registrations in New South Wales, Australia for patients with a primary diagnosis of AF between 2009 and 2017. We investigated factors associated with receiving CA (using Cox regression) and early ablation (using logistic regression). Results: Cardioversion during index admission (hazard ratio [HR] 1.96; 95% CI 1.75-2.19), year of index admission (HR 1.07; 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10), private patient status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 2.35-2.97), and living in more advantaged areas (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.13-1.22) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving CA. Private patient status (odds ratio [OR] 2.04; 95% CI 1.59-2.61) and a history of cardioversion (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.0-1.57) and diabetes (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.06-2.41) were associated with receiving early ablation. Conclusion: Beyond clinical factors, private patients are more likely to receive CA and earlier ablation than their public counterparts. Whether the earlier access to ablation procedures in private patients is leading to differences in outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation remains to be explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quiroz et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=46,764). Private patient status vs. Public patient status was evaluated on Receiving catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (HR 2.65, 95% CI 2.35-2.97). Private patient status was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of receiving catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation compared to public patient status (HR 2.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: