Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of 2,5-[( E )- N -methyl-4-[2-[4-[( l )-prolinoxy]phenyl]ethenyl]pyridinium p -toluensulfonate] (POST) 4 -ester and POST 4 -amide polymers were prepared on negatively charged solid substrates by the electrostatic interaction between the chromophore and the substrate and characterized using UV−vis spectroscopy, second harmonic generation intensity (SHG) measurement, ellipsometry, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy. Simultaneous measurements of UV−vis absorption, SHG intensity, and ellipsometry for the various reaction times indicated that the most densely packed monolayers were found for the two samples. For POST 4 -ester: reaction time, 30 min; thickness, 12 Å; tilt angle, 34.6°; chromophore density, 3.43/nm 2 . For POST 4 -amide: reaction time, 60 min; thickness, 6 Å; tilt angle, 41.7°; chromophore density, 3.60/nm 2 . POST 4 -amide SAMs showed higher chromophore density and SHG intensity than POST 4 -ester SAMs due to the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between amide backbones. The order of the second-order susceptibility coefficient, d 33 was measured to be ca. 400 pm/V for POST 4 -amide. In situ thermal relaxation studies also revealed high thermal stability. For example, at a high temperature of 120 °C, it was demonstrated that the chromophores inside SAMs were not disorganized but changed in their chemical structure due to the chemical shift of the resonance balance between benzenoid and quinoid forms of the chromophore.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Im et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: