Key result
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now recognized as a reliable and central source of information for healthcare evaluation, contrasting with historical clinician-only assessments.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become a central and reliable source of information in healthcare evaluation, marking a significant shift from historical reliance solely on clinician assessment.
It is perhaps tempting to think of progress in medicine as characterised by developments such as vaccinations, penicillin and advances in surgery. However, the late 20th century saw a remarkable change in the approach to evaluating healthcare interventions which may have gone largely unnoticed by both the general public and, indeed, many patients. Patients’ reports have now become central to healthcare evaluation, and this was simply not the case historically. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now regularly used to systematically gain meaningful subjective accounts from those receiving care. This is in stark contrast to the prevailing approach adopted to outcomes measurement throughout most of the 20th century and before; namely, that outcomes should be assessed by professionals, such as clinicians and researchers. Reports from patients were, traditionally, viewed as subjective, and consequently unreliable. Significant evidence, however, has accumulated that patient reports are not only a reliable source of information, but also one of the most important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkinson et al. (2015) reported a review. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now recognized as a reliable and central source of information for healthcare evaluation, contrasting with historical clinician-only assessments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: