Key result
Edoxaban 15 mg and 30 mg resulted in similar rates of thromboembolic events compared to enoxaparin (3.8% and 2.8% vs 4.1%) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Why the study?
Does edoxaban prevent thromboembolic events in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty compared to enoxaparin?
Population
n=264 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan and Taiwan.
Comparison
Edoxaban 15 mg or 30 mg oral once daily, started… vs Enoxaparin 20 mg subcutaneous twice daily…
Design
RCT, Randomized, parallel group, Double-blind for edoxaban, open-label for…
Follow-up
11 to 14 days
Authors
Loading...
Edoxaban offers a convenient oral alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after hip arthroplasty; confirms comparable efficacy in this RCT.
RCT (n=264)
Double-blind / Open-label
Randomized
Yes
Does edoxaban prevent thromboembolic events in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty compared to enoxaparin?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.8% vs 4.1%
Oral edoxaban 15 mg and 30 mg once daily demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip arthroplasty.
Fuji et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n=264). Edoxaban vs. Enoxaparin 20 mg BID was evaluated on Incidence of thromboembolic events (composite of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis [DVT], symptomatic pulmonary embolism [PE], or symptomatic DVT). Edoxaban 15 mg and 30 mg resulted in similar rates of thromboembolic events compared to enoxaparin (3.8% and 2.8% vs 4.1%) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: