Key result
The Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) demonstrated test-retest reliability across visits (ICC = 0.588) among healthy adolescent and adult athletes.
Why the study?
The Dynamic Exertion Test was developed to inform return-to-play decisions after sport-related concussion, but its reliability and minimal detectable change scores across physiological, performance, and clinical outcomes required documentation.
Does the Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) demonstrate test-retest reliability in healthy athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=79)
Does the Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) demonstrate test-retest reliability in healthy athletes?
The Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) demonstrates acceptable test-retest reliability in healthy athletes, supporting its potential utility for return-to-play decision-making following sport-related concussion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EXiT reliability in healthy athletes is hypothesis-generating; leaves open clinical adoption for concussion return-to-play pending injured-athlete validation.
BACKGROUND: The Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) was developed to inform return-to-play (RTP) decision-making following clinical recovery from sport-related concussion (SRC). The purpose of the current study was to document intrarater and test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for physiological [heart rate (HR) and blood pressure], performance (change-of-direction task completion time and errors), and clinical outcomes (endorsed symptoms, perceived exertion) of EXiT, and interrater reliability of performance outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: Healthy athletes would exhibit stable physiological responses to the EXiT across visits, demonstrate consistent change-of-direction task completion time between consecutive trials at each visit, and the fastest time (of 2 trials) across visits, and endorse equivocal symptoms and effort across visits. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, test-retest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Seventy-nine (female: 34 [43%], 19.6 ± 5.0 years) athletes completed the EXiT at 2 study visits (8.7 ± 4.7 days between visits). Two-way, mixed, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate intrarater and test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha was used to document the internal consistency of symptoms at each visit, and MDC scores were calculated on the physiological, performance, and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The current investigation established test-retest reliability in addition to MDC scores of an objective dynamic exercise assessment among healthy adolescent and adult athletes. The EXiT may be an objective approach to inform RTP decision-making following SRC recovery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The EXiT is a clinically feasible exertion-based assessment that can be readily administered in a variety of outpatient clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinnott et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy athletes (n=79). Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) was evaluated on Test-retest reliability across visits (ICC 0.588). The Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) demonstrated test-retest reliability across visits (ICC = 0.588) among healthy adolescent and adult athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: