Key result
Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels >500 ng/mL demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI, 81.7%-98.6%) and a negative predictive value of 91.4% for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism.
Why the study?
Does a quantitative plasma D-dimer level less than 500 ng/mL accurately rule out acute pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing diagnostic pulmonary angiography?
Population
173 patients undergoing diagnostic pulmonary arteriography for suspected acute pulmonary embolism at four…
Comparison
Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels measured… vs Pulmonary angiographic results.
Design
Cross-sectional, Blinded comparison
Authors
Loading...
May support avoiding angiography if D-dimer <500 ng/mL; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Observational (n=173)
Blinded
Yes
Does a quantitative plasma D-dimer level less than 500 ng/mL accurately rule out acute pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing diagnostic pulmonary angiography?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 93.3% (95% CI 81.7% to 98.6%)
p-value: p=0.016
Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels less than 500 ng/mL have a high negative predictive value for acute pulmonary embolism, potentially obviating the need for invasive pulmonary angiography.
Samuel Z. Goldhaber (1993) conducted an observational in Suspected acute pulmonary embolism (n=173). Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels vs. Pulmonary angiography was evaluated on Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (Sensitivity 93.3%, 95% CI 81.7% to 98.6%, p=0.016). Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels >500 ng/mL demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI, 81.7%-98.6%) and a negative predictive value of 91.4% for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: